{"id":18580,"date":"2016-10-20T17:09:59","date_gmt":"2016-10-20T16:09:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/?page_id=18580"},"modified":"2017-04-28T10:44:57","modified_gmt":"2017-04-28T09:44:57","slug":"polyhedron-benchmarks-amdwindows-sept-2015","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/historic-tables\/fortran-compiler-comparisons-2015\/polyhedron-benchmarks-amdwindows-sept-2015\/","title":{"rendered":"Polyhedron Benchmarks (AMD+Windows Sept 2015)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Win64 on AMD Processor<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\nAbsoft<\/i><\/b>
\n15.0.2<\/small><\/span><\/td>\n		Absoft(AP)<\/i><\/b>
\n15.0.2<\/small><\/span><\/td>\n		FTN95<\/i><\/b>
\n7.20<\/small><\/span><\/td>\n		Intel<\/i><\/b>
\n16.0<\/small><\/span><\/td>\n		Intel(AP)<\/i><\/b>
\n16.0<\/small><\/span><\/td>\n		Lahey-GNU<\/i><\/b>
\nLassen-4.93<\/small><\/span><\/td>\n		NAG<\/i><\/b>
\n6.0<\/small><\/span><\/td>\n		PGI<\/i><\/b>
\n15.7<\/small><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AC<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n7.65<\/span><\/td>\n7.82<\/span><\/td>\n15.76<\/span><\/td>\n6.92<\/span><\/td>\n6.97<\/span><\/td>\n8.46<\/span><\/td>\n10.19<\/span><\/td>\n8.65<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AERMOD<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n19.02<\/span><\/td>\n19.85<\/span><\/td>\n33.43<\/span><\/td>\n17.40<\/span><\/td>\n17.49<\/span><\/td>\n28.22<\/span><\/td>\n24.98<\/span><\/td>\n17.99<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AIR<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n6.77<\/span><\/td>\n3.18<\/span><\/td>\n13.83<\/span><\/td>\n4.89<\/span><\/td>\n2.44<\/span><\/td>\n7.54<\/span><\/td>\n7.70<\/span><\/td>\n11.52<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CAPACITA<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n37.56<\/span><\/td>\n32.29<\/span><\/td>\n65.03<\/span><\/td>\n37.50<\/span><\/td>\n37.18<\/span><\/td>\n44.56<\/span><\/td>\n49.29<\/span><\/td>\n31.90<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CHANNEL2<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n144.55<\/span><\/td>\n116.56<\/span><\/td>\n363.63<\/span><\/td>\n145.95<\/span><\/td>\n111.64<\/span><\/td>\n151.41<\/span><\/td>\n222.53<\/span><\/td>\n141.77<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
DODUC<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n27.77<\/span><\/td>\n28.40<\/span><\/td>\n49.45<\/span><\/td>\n21.27<\/span><\/td>\n21.45<\/span><\/td>\n29.75<\/span><\/td>\n30.34<\/span><\/td>\n26.88<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
FATIGUE2<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n81.96<\/span><\/td>\n86.98<\/span><\/td>\n422.66<\/span><\/td>\n75.86<\/span><\/td>\n75.84<\/span><\/td>\n44.01<\/span><\/td>\n128.10<\/span><\/td>\n173.18<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
GAS_DYN2<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n102.38<\/span><\/td>\n103.54<\/span><\/td>\n560.43<\/span><\/td>\n100.13<\/span><\/td>\n99.83<\/span><\/td>\n230.00<\/span><\/td>\n200.36<\/span><\/td>\n130.14<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
INDUCT2<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n96.23<\/span><\/td>\n69.85<\/span><\/td>\n601.08<\/span><\/td>\n111.23<\/span><\/td>\n44.56<\/span><\/td>\n96.88<\/span><\/td>\n150.97<\/span><\/td>\n167.40<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
LINPK<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n9.42<\/span><\/td>\n9.28<\/span><\/td>\n10.70<\/span><\/td>\n9.70<\/span><\/td>\n9.73<\/span><\/td>\n10.33<\/span><\/td>\n10.22<\/span><\/td>\n10.30<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MDBX<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n12.47<\/span><\/td>\n11.60<\/span><\/td>\n24.09<\/span><\/td>\n10.62<\/span><\/td>\n10.78<\/span><\/td>\n11.51<\/span><\/td>\n12.50<\/span><\/td>\n14.67<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MP_PROP_DESIGN<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n137.74<\/span><\/td>\n42.24<\/span><\/td>\n692.06<\/span><\/td>\n101.05<\/span><\/td>\n32.51<\/span><\/td>\n282.85<\/span><\/td>\n286.72<\/span><\/td>\n138.63<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
NF<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n18.31<\/span><\/td>\n16.79<\/span><\/td>\n28.32<\/span><\/td>\n14.04<\/span><\/td>\n14.04<\/span><\/td>\n16.83<\/span><\/td>\n19.36<\/span><\/td>\n13.91<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
PROTEIN<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n31.53<\/span><\/td>\n30.73<\/span><\/td>\n56.31<\/span><\/td>\n31.78<\/span><\/td>\n31.86<\/span><\/td>\n32.46<\/span><\/td>\n32.37<\/span><\/td>\n35.48<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
RNFLOW<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n17.51<\/span><\/td>\n21.29<\/span><\/td>\n35.90<\/span><\/td>\n18.90<\/span><\/td>\n20.11<\/span><\/td>\n22.34<\/span><\/td>\n24.30<\/span><\/td>\n24.25<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
TEST_FPU2<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n94.39<\/span><\/td>\n89.87<\/span><\/td>\n192.98<\/span><\/td>\n85.44<\/span><\/td>\n80.59<\/span><\/td>\n102.44<\/span><\/td>\n118.30<\/span><\/td>\n89.20<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
TFFT2<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n135.46<\/span><\/td>\n133.22<\/span><\/td>\n168.52<\/span><\/td>\n135.93<\/span><\/td>\n135.99<\/span><\/td>\n89.08<\/span><\/td>\n137.72<\/span><\/td>\n138.16<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Geometric Mean<\/b><\/i><\/span><\/strong><\/td>\n35.72<\/span><\/td>\n30.77<\/span><\/td>\n82.79<\/span><\/td>\n32.81<\/span><\/td>\n27.53<\/span><\/td>\n39.40<\/span><\/td>\n46.59<\/span><\/td>\n40.93<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Compiler Switches<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Absoft<\/strong>
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n		af90 -m64 -O4 -speed_math=10 -fast_math-march=barcelona -xINTEGER -stack:0\u00d730000000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Absoft (autoparallel)
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n		af90 -m64 -O5 -speed_math=10 -fast_math -march=barcelona -xINTEGER -stack:0\u00d730000000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
FTN95<\/strong><\/td>\nftn95 \/p6 \/optimize (slink was used to increase the stack size)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Intel<\/strong><\/td>\nifort \/fast \/link \/stack:64000000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Intel (autoparallel)<\/strong><\/td>\nifort \/fast \/Qparallel \/link \/stack:64000000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Lahey-GNU<\/strong><\/td>\nlgf -64 -ofast -unroll -wpo -stack 64000000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
NAG<\/strong><\/td>\nnagfor -abi=64 -O4 -s -v -V<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
PGI<\/strong><\/td>\npgf90 -V -fastsse -Munroll=n:4 -Mipa=fast,inline<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n
Notes<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
All figures are execution times in seconds – measured on a machine with an AMD Phenom II X4 955 processor (3.2 GHz), with 8 GBytes memory, running Windows 7 64-bit. Each figure is the average over at least 10 runs (many more for some). Measurement error is typically <1%. Green cells highlight figures within 10% of the fastest. Red cells indicate figures which are more than 150% of the fastest. So far as possible, we have used the compiler switches which give the best overall results. We have not attempted to tune individual benchmarks, and, in particular cases, different switch settings may give better results. We have created and used 64 bit executables where possible, and 32 bit executables where the compiler does not offer a 64 bit option. The settings used for the Absoft and Intel compilers enable autoparallelization. Autoparallelization settings are not used on any other compilers because we found that they produced no significant performance benefits on this benchmark set. Thanks are due to Jos Bergervoet for permission to use his CAPACITA benchmark, to Quetzal Associates for permission to use their CHANNEL, FATIGUE, GAS_DYN, INDUCT, PROTEIN and RNFLOW benchmarks, to David Frank for his TEST_FPU benchmark, to Anthony Falzone for the use of MP_PROP_DESIGN, and to Ted Addison of McVehil-Monnett Associates for permission to use AERMOD, an air quality model used by the US Environmental Protection Agency. All the benchmarks have been modified slightly to fit into our benchmarking harness.<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Win64 on AMD Processor Absoft 15.0.2 Absoft(AP) 15.0.2 FTN95 7.20 Intel 16.0 Intel(AP) 16.0 Lahey-GNU Lassen-4.93 NAG 6.0 PGI 15.7 AC 7.65 7.82 15.76 6.92 6.97 8.46 10.19 8.65 AERMOD 19.02 19.85 33.43 17.40 17.49 28.22 24.98 17.99 AIR 6.77 3.18 13.83 4.89 2.44 7.54 7.70 11.52 CAPACITA 37.56 32.29 65.03 37.50 37.18 44.56 49.29 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":18444,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"yoast_head":"\nPolyhedron Benchmarks (AMD+Windows Sept 2015) - Fortran UK<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/historic-tables\/fortran-compiler-comparisons-2015\/polyhedron-benchmarks-amdwindows-sept-2015\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Polyhedron Benchmarks (AMD+Windows Sept 2015) - Fortran UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Win64 on AMD Processor Absoft 15.0.2 Absoft(AP) 15.0.2 FTN95 7.20 Intel 16.0 Intel(AP) 16.0 Lahey-GNU Lassen-4.93 NAG 6.0 PGI 15.7 AC 7.65 7.82 15.76 6.92 6.97 8.46 10.19 8.65 AERMOD 19.02 19.85 33.43 17.40 17.49 28.22 24.98 17.99 AIR 6.77 3.18 13.83 4.89 2.44 7.54 7.70 11.52 CAPACITA 37.56 32.29 65.03 37.50 37.18 44.56 49.29 […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/historic-tables\/fortran-compiler-comparisons-2015\/polyhedron-benchmarks-amdwindows-sept-2015\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Fortran UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-28T09:44:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/historic-tables\/fortran-compiler-comparisons-2015\/polyhedron-benchmarks-amdwindows-sept-2015\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/historic-tables\/fortran-compiler-comparisons-2015\/polyhedron-benchmarks-amdwindows-sept-2015\/\",\"name\":\"Polyhedron Benchmarks (AMD+Windows Sept 2015) - Fortran UK\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-10-20T16:09:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-28T09:44:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/historic-tables\/fortran-compiler-comparisons-2015\/polyhedron-benchmarks-amdwindows-sept-2015\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/historic-tables\/fortran-compiler-comparisons-2015\/polyhedron-benchmarks-amdwindows-sept-2015\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/historic-tables\/fortran-compiler-comparisons-2015\/polyhedron-benchmarks-amdwindows-sept-2015\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Historic Benchmark Tables\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/historic-tables\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Fortran Compiler Comparisons (2015)\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/historic-tables\/fortran-compiler-comparisons-2015\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":4,\"name\":\"Polyhedron Benchmarks (AMD+Windows Sept 2015)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/\",\"name\":\"Fortran UK\",\"description\":\"All things Fortran\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Polyhedron Solutions Ltd.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Web-logoPolySol.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Web-logoPolySol.png\",\"width\":203,\"height\":113,\"caption\":\"Polyhedron Solutions Ltd.\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@polyhedronsolutions1405\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Polyhedron Benchmarks (AMD+Windows Sept 2015) - Fortran UK","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/historic-tables\/fortran-compiler-comparisons-2015\/polyhedron-benchmarks-amdwindows-sept-2015\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Polyhedron Benchmarks (AMD+Windows Sept 2015) - Fortran UK","og_description":"Win64 on AMD Processor Absoft 15.0.2 Absoft(AP) 15.0.2 FTN95 7.20 Intel 16.0 Intel(AP) 16.0 Lahey-GNU Lassen-4.93 NAG 6.0 PGI 15.7 AC 7.65 7.82 15.76 6.92 6.97 8.46 10.19 8.65 AERMOD 19.02 19.85 33.43 17.40 17.49 28.22 24.98 17.99 AIR 6.77 3.18 13.83 4.89 2.44 7.54 7.70 11.52 CAPACITA 37.56 32.29 65.03 37.50 37.18 44.56 49.29 […]","og_url":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/historic-tables\/fortran-compiler-comparisons-2015\/polyhedron-benchmarks-amdwindows-sept-2015\/","og_site_name":"Fortran UK","article_modified_time":"2017-04-28T09:44:57+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Estimated reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/historic-tables\/fortran-compiler-comparisons-2015\/polyhedron-benchmarks-amdwindows-sept-2015\/","url":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/historic-tables\/fortran-compiler-comparisons-2015\/polyhedron-benchmarks-amdwindows-sept-2015\/","name":"Polyhedron Benchmarks (AMD+Windows Sept 2015) - Fortran UK","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-10-20T16:09:59+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-28T09:44:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/historic-tables\/fortran-compiler-comparisons-2015\/polyhedron-benchmarks-amdwindows-sept-2015\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/fortran.uk\/historic-tables\/fortran-compiler-comparisons-2015\/polyhedron-benchmarks-amdwindows-sept-2015\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/historic-tables\/fortran-compiler-comparisons-2015\/polyhedron-benchmarks-amdwindows-sept-2015\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Historic Benchmark Tables","item":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/historic-tables\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Fortran Compiler Comparisons (2015)","item":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/historic-tables\/fortran-compiler-comparisons-2015\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"Polyhedron Benchmarks (AMD+Windows Sept 2015)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/","name":"Fortran UK","description":"All things Fortran","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/#organization","name":"Polyhedron Solutions Ltd.","url":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Web-logoPolySol.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Web-logoPolySol.png","width":203,"height":113,"caption":"Polyhedron Solutions Ltd."},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@polyhedronsolutions1405"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18580"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18580"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18580\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18813,"href":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18580\/revisions\/18813"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18580"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}