{"id":18464,"date":"2015-09-14T16:36:18","date_gmt":"2015-09-14T15:36:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/?page_id=18464"},"modified":"2017-04-28T10:21:41","modified_gmt":"2017-04-28T09:21:41","slug":"polyhedron-benchmarks-win64-on-intel","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/fortran-compiler-comparisons\/polyhedron-benchmarks-win64-on-intel\/","title":{"rendered":"Polyhedron Benchmarks (Intel+Windows)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Win64 on Intel Processor<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\nAbsoft<\/i><\/b>
\n17.0<\/small><\/span><\/td>\n		Absoft(AP)<\/i><\/b>
\n17.0<\/small><\/span><\/td>\n		FTN95<\/i><\/b>
\n8.05<\/small><\/span><\/td>\n		Intel<\/i><\/b>
\n17.0<\/small><\/span><\/td>\n		Intel(AP)<\/i><\/b>
\n17.0<\/small><\/span><\/td>\n		gfortran<\/i><\/b>
\n5.4.1 (Lahey-GNU Fortran)<\/small><\/span><\/td>\n		NAG<\/i><\/b>
\n6.1<\/small><\/span><\/td>\n		PGI<\/i><\/b>
\n16.9<\/small><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AC<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n 5.55 <\/span><\/td>\n 5.55 <\/span><\/td>\n 11.35 <\/span><\/td>\n 4.70 <\/span><\/td>\n 4.68 <\/span><\/td>\n 6.48 <\/span><\/td>\n 7.50 <\/span><\/td>\n 8.96 <\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AERMOD<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n 13.40 <\/span><\/td>\n 13.56 <\/span><\/td>\n 26.10 <\/span><\/td>\n 12.16 <\/span><\/td>\n 12.73 <\/span><\/td>\n 26.92 <\/span><\/td>\n 19.55 <\/span><\/td>\n 15.45 <\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AIR<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n 3.72 <\/span><\/td>\n 4.20 <\/span><\/td>\n 9.07 <\/span><\/td>\n 3.02 <\/span><\/td>\n 2.83 <\/span><\/td>\n 5.24 <\/span><\/td>\n 5.45 <\/span><\/td>\n 5.61 <\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CAPACITA<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n 22.49 <\/span><\/td>\n 21.96 <\/span><\/td>\n 45.49 <\/span><\/td>\n 18.77 <\/span><\/td>\n 18.78 <\/span><\/td>\n 20.73 <\/span><\/td>\n 23.54 <\/span><\/td>\n 19.16 <\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CHANNEL2<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n 86.59 <\/span><\/td>\n 68.74 <\/span><\/td>\n 204.20 <\/span><\/td>\n 90.21 <\/span><\/td>\n 55.70 <\/span><\/td>\n 91.74 <\/span><\/td>\n 119.34 <\/span><\/td>\n 90.42 <\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
DODUC<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n 20.44 <\/span><\/td>\n 20.70 <\/span><\/td>\n 36.60 <\/span><\/td>\n 15.31 <\/span><\/td>\n 15.40 <\/span><\/td>\n 29.85 <\/span><\/td>\n 24.03 <\/span><\/td>\n 22.31 <\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
FATIGUE2<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n 64.56 <\/span><\/td>\n 69.55 <\/span><\/td>\n 295.93 <\/span><\/td>\n 54.56 <\/span><\/td>\n 55.69 <\/span><\/td>\n 38.68 <\/span><\/td>\n 94.16 <\/span><\/td>\n 127.13 <\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
GAS_DYN2<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n 66.69 <\/span><\/td>\n 46.05 <\/span><\/td>\n 501.52 <\/span><\/td>\n 68.26 <\/span><\/td>\n 43.33 <\/span><\/td>\n 286.31 <\/span><\/td>\n 181.57 <\/span><\/td>\n 120.41 <\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
INDUCT2<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n 85.10 <\/span><\/td>\n 195.89 <\/span><\/td>\n 432.09 <\/span><\/td>\n 71.83 <\/span><\/td>\n 59.54 <\/span><\/td>\n 90.62 <\/span><\/td>\n 130.36 <\/span><\/td>\n 131.77 <\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
LINPK<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n 6.14 <\/span><\/td>\n 6.46 <\/span><\/td>\n 6.70 <\/span><\/td>\n 4.98 <\/span><\/td>\n 5.24 <\/span><\/td>\n 5.79 <\/span><\/td>\n 7.42 <\/span><\/td>\n 6.91 <\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MDBX<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n 9.90 <\/span><\/td>\n 10.08 <\/span><\/td>\n 15.03 <\/span><\/td>\n 6.74 <\/span><\/td>\n 5.24 <\/span><\/td>\n 8.22 <\/span><\/td>\n 8.84 <\/span><\/td>\n 9.50 <\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MP_PROP_DESIGN<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n 125.67 <\/span><\/td>\n 34.35 <\/span><\/td>\n 622.82 <\/span><\/td>\n 64.28 <\/span><\/td>\n 13.30 <\/span><\/td>\n 445.16 <\/span><\/td>\n 185.83 <\/span><\/td>\n 97.50 <\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
NF<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n 9.11 <\/span><\/td>\n 9.55 <\/span><\/td>\n 17.56 <\/span><\/td>\n 8.37 <\/span><\/td>\n 8.08 <\/span><\/td>\n 8.41 <\/span><\/td>\n 10.13 <\/span><\/td>\n 10.29 <\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
PROTEIN<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n 21.81 <\/span><\/td>\n 22.78 <\/span><\/td>\n 40.69 <\/span><\/td>\n 22.12 <\/span><\/td>\n 22.36 <\/span><\/td>\n 21.20 <\/span><\/td>\n 20.24 <\/span><\/td>\n 24.22 <\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
RNFLOW<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n 16.04 <\/span><\/td>\n 18.67 <\/span><\/td>\n 42.31 <\/span><\/td>\n 12.69 <\/span><\/td>\n 10.24 <\/span><\/td>\n 14.96 <\/span><\/td>\n 17.84 <\/span><\/td>\n 18.25 <\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
TEST_FPU2<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n 65.61 <\/span><\/td>\n 82.17 <\/span><\/td>\n 222.38 <\/span><\/td>\n 46.13 <\/span><\/td>\n 44.34 <\/span><\/td>\n 53.31 <\/span><\/td>\n 86.45 <\/span><\/td>\n 52.02 <\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
TFFT2<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n 53.26 <\/span><\/td>\n 53.84 <\/span><\/td>\n 69.01 <\/span><\/td>\n 49.36 <\/span><\/td>\n 49.00 <\/span><\/td>\n 49.75 <\/span><\/td>\n 53.27 <\/span><\/td>\n 49.19 <\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Geometric Mean<\/b><\/i><\/span><\/strong><\/td>\n 24.24 <\/span><\/td>\n 23.78 <\/span><\/td>\n 60.02 <\/span><\/td>\n 20.06 <\/span><\/td>\n 16.64 <\/span><\/td>\n 29.12 <\/span><\/td>\n 31.17 <\/span><\/td>\n 28.20 <\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Compiler Switches<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Absoft<\/strong><\/td>\naf90 -m64 -O4 -speed_math=10 -fast_math -march=core -xINTEGER -stack:0x30000000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Absoft (autoparallel)<\/strong><\/td>\n-m64 -mavx -O5 -speed_math=10 -fast_math -march=core -xINTEGER -stack:0\u00d730000000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
FTN95<\/strong><\/td>\nftn95 \/p6 \/optimize (slink was used to increase the stack size)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Intel<\/strong><\/td>\nifort \/fast \/nostandard-realloc-lhs \/link \/stack:64000000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Intel (autoparallel)<\/strong><\/td>\nifort \/fast \/Qparallel \/nostandard-realloc-lhs \/link \/stack:64000000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Lahey-GNU<\/strong><\/td>\nlgf -64 -ofast -unroll -wpo -stack 64000000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
NAG<\/strong><\/td>\nnagfor -abi=64 -O4 -s -v -V<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
PGI<\/strong><\/td>\npgf90 -V -fastsse -Munroll=n:4 -Mipa=fast,inline<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
Notes<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
All figures are execution times in seconds – measured on a machine with 2 x Xeon E5-2643 3.30GHz quad core processors, running at stock speed with hyperthreading disabled, 64 GBytes memory, and running 64-bit Windows 7 64-bit. Each figure is the average over at least 10 runs (many more for some). Measurement error is typically <1%. Green cells highlight figures within 10% of the fastest. Red cells indicate figures which are more than 150% of the fastest. So far as possible, we have used the compiler switches which give the best overall results. We have not attempted to tune individual benchmarks, and, in particular cases, different switch settings may give better results. Where possible, compiler switches were set to generate 64 bit executables. The settings used for the Absoft and Intel compilers enable autoparallelization. Autoparallelization settings are not used on any other compilers because we found that they produced no significant performance benefits on this benchmark set.\u00a0 Thanks are due to Jos Bergervoet for permission to use his CAPACITA benchmark, to Quetzal Associates for permission to use their CHANNEL, FATIGUE, GAS_DYN, INDUCT, PROTEIN and RNFLOW benchmarks, to David Frank for his TEST_FPU benchmark, to Anthony Falzone for the use of MP_PROP_DESIGN, and to Ted Addison of McVehil-Monnett Associates for permission to use AERMOD, an air quality model used by the US Environmental Protection Agency.\u00a0 All the benchmarks have been modified slightly to fit into our benchmarking harness.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n

Return to Fortran Compiler Comparisons homepage<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Win64 on Intel Processor Absoft 17.0 Absoft(AP) 17.0 FTN95 8.05 Intel 17.0 Intel(AP) 17.0 gfortran 5.4.1 (Lahey-GNU Fortran) NAG 6.1 PGI 16.9 AC 5.55 5.55 11.35 4.70 4.68 6.48 7.50 8.96 AERMOD 13.40 13.56 26.10 12.16 12.73 26.92 19.55 15.45 AIR 3.72 4.20 9.07 3.02 2.83 5.24 5.45 5.61 CAPACITA 22.49 21.96 45.49 18.77 18.78 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":18574,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"yoast_head":"\nPolyhedron Benchmarks (Intel+Windows) - Fortran UK<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Polyhedron benchmarks: a comparison of the performance of various Windows Fortran compilers on an Intel Xeon E5-2643 processor.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/fortran-compiler-comparisons\/polyhedron-benchmarks-win64-on-intel\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Polyhedron Benchmarks (Intel+Windows) - Fortran UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Polyhedron benchmarks: a comparison of the performance of various Windows Fortran compilers on an Intel Xeon E5-2643 processor.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/fortran-compiler-comparisons\/polyhedron-benchmarks-win64-on-intel\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Fortran UK\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-28T09:21:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/fortran-compiler-comparisons\/polyhedron-benchmarks-win64-on-intel\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/fortran-compiler-comparisons\/polyhedron-benchmarks-win64-on-intel\/\",\"name\":\"Polyhedron Benchmarks (Intel+Windows) - Fortran UK\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-09-14T15:36:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-28T09:21:41+00:00\",\"description\":\"Polyhedron benchmarks: a comparison of the performance of various Windows Fortran compilers on an Intel Xeon E5-2643 processor.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/fortran-compiler-comparisons\/polyhedron-benchmarks-win64-on-intel\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/fortran-compiler-comparisons\/polyhedron-benchmarks-win64-on-intel\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/fortran-compiler-comparisons\/polyhedron-benchmarks-win64-on-intel\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Fortran Compiler Comparisons\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/fortran-compiler-comparisons\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Polyhedron Benchmarks (Intel+Windows)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/\",\"name\":\"Fortran UK\",\"description\":\"All things Fortran\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Polyhedron Solutions Ltd.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Web-logoPolySol.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Web-logoPolySol.png\",\"width\":203,\"height\":113,\"caption\":\"Polyhedron Solutions Ltd.\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@polyhedronsolutions1405\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Polyhedron Benchmarks (Intel+Windows) - Fortran UK","description":"Polyhedron benchmarks: a comparison of the performance of various Windows Fortran compilers on an Intel Xeon E5-2643 processor.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/fortran-compiler-comparisons\/polyhedron-benchmarks-win64-on-intel\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Polyhedron Benchmarks (Intel+Windows) - Fortran UK","og_description":"Polyhedron benchmarks: a comparison of the performance of various Windows Fortran compilers on an Intel Xeon E5-2643 processor.","og_url":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/fortran-compiler-comparisons\/polyhedron-benchmarks-win64-on-intel\/","og_site_name":"Fortran UK","article_modified_time":"2017-04-28T09:21:41+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Estimated reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/fortran-compiler-comparisons\/polyhedron-benchmarks-win64-on-intel\/","url":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/fortran-compiler-comparisons\/polyhedron-benchmarks-win64-on-intel\/","name":"Polyhedron Benchmarks (Intel+Windows) - Fortran UK","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/#website"},"datePublished":"2015-09-14T15:36:18+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-28T09:21:41+00:00","description":"Polyhedron benchmarks: a comparison of the performance of various Windows Fortran compilers on an Intel Xeon E5-2643 processor.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/fortran-compiler-comparisons\/polyhedron-benchmarks-win64-on-intel\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/fortran.uk\/fortran-compiler-comparisons\/polyhedron-benchmarks-win64-on-intel\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/fortran-compiler-comparisons\/polyhedron-benchmarks-win64-on-intel\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Fortran Compiler Comparisons","item":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/fortran-compiler-comparisons\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Polyhedron Benchmarks (Intel+Windows)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/","name":"Fortran UK","description":"All things Fortran","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/#organization","name":"Polyhedron Solutions Ltd.","url":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Web-logoPolySol.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Web-logoPolySol.png","width":203,"height":113,"caption":"Polyhedron Solutions Ltd."},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@polyhedronsolutions1405"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18464"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18464"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18464\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18801,"href":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18464\/revisions\/18801"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/18574"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fortran.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18464"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}